Worst Video Game of the 21st Century!!! >:(

QwertyFail · **Posted:** Wed Apr 27, 2011 7:38 am

You buy the game, but you can't play it, because you have to buy at least one of the accessories just to play it! :evil:

Note: This game was meant to be played by children under the age of 7-10... REALLY STUPID CHILDREN UNDER THE AGE OF 7-10!!! :evil:

Nameless1 · **Posted:** Wed Apr 27, 2011 2:52 pm

I'm pretty sure that the game would come with one charccter to start with, then treat the rest of the stuff as a physical version of DLC.

QwertyFail · **Posted:** Thu Apr 28, 2011 12:45 am

Nameless1 wrote:

I'm pretty sure that the game would come with one charccter to start with, then treat the rest of the stuff as a physical version of DLC.

I did a little bit of research in my spare time, and it turns out that you have to buy EVERYTHING from Toys R Us...

Nameless1 · **Posted:** Thu Apr 28, 2011 1:27 am

Wow, that's a stupid marketing decision.

Omar · **Posted:** Sat Apr 30, 2011 2:20 am

it's activision. they want your money cause they love money like EA only that EA offers better games.
children from 7-10 play COD not real games, that offers real entertainment. PS3 now a days Even Include the Playstation move.

and kids will buy it cause it's mostly buy toys.
If i were you i'd buy a Bitch.

Nameless1 · **Posted:** Mon May 02, 2011 4:25 am

Wow, all I've seen you do is attack companies and complain about things.

(personal opinion)

Alessa Mason · **Posted:** Mon May 02, 2011 9:51 am

Nameless1 wrote:

Wow, all I've seen you do is attack companies and complain about things.

(personal opinion)

Agree....

Players shouldn't complain about the games......since the companies put their effort in it...

We should appreciate their effort..

Omar · **Posted:** Mon May 02, 2011 11:18 pm

Nameless1 wrote:

Wow, all I've seen you do is attack companies and complain about things.

(personal opinion)

Where's your proof that i attack companies?
sure i attack EA and activision. those are the only companys i attack.
for example EA published Mass effect 2 and it "was going to be for Xbox" but EA decided to put it on PC then it went to the PS3, so EA can win more money, but of course EA doesn't make games they publish them. that's what i called a Corrupted company. but more corrupted is Activision they offer every year a call of duty title and Guitar hero title, they barely even do new games.

where did i say that all gaming companies suck? where is your evedence?

by the way...we're getting way off topic!

Nameless1 · **Posted:** Tue May 03, 2011 12:29 am

Omar wrote:

Where's your proof that i attack companies?
sure i attack EA and activision. those are the only companys i attack.
for example EA published Mass effect 2 and it "was going to be for Xbox" but EA decided to put it on PC then it went to the PS3, so EA can win more money, but of course EA doesn't make games they publish them. that's what i called a Corrupted company. but more corrupted is Activision they offer every year a call of duty title and Guitar hero title, they barely even do new games.

where did i say that all gaming companies suck? where is your evedence?

by the way...we're getting way off topic!

I rest my case.

Daniel Sun · **Joined:** Thu Feb 18, 2010 8:44 am **Posts:** 771

The game looks amazing. What your problem?

Alessa Mason · **Posted:** Tue May 03, 2011 1:55 pm

Daniel Sun wrote:

The game looks amazing. What your problem?

Someone can't just stop complaining....that's all.

3lijahG · **Joined:** Fri Mar 11, 2011 3:18 am **Posts:** 1079

Daniel Sun wrote:

The game looks amazing. What your problem?

probably the part where you go into 'toys r us', lol ...

QwertyFail · **Posted:** Tue May 03, 2011 11:41 pm

Daniel Sun wrote:

The game looks amazing. What your problem?

It's just the marketing method they're using to get children to buy the game that makes me mad... :evil:

Nameless1 · **Posted:** Sat May 07, 2011 4:28 pm

Oooh, now they have bots that repeat what you say.

BURN THEM!

Alessa Mason · **Posted:** Sat May 07, 2011 6:35 pm

Nameless1 wrote:

Oooh, now they have bots that repeat what you say.

BURN THEM!

*sigh*,,,,maybe he/she/it isn't a bot.
You're over-reacted.

Nameless1 · **Posted:** Sat May 07, 2011 6:49 pm

This things has also posted on two more threads and all it's ever said was something or a port of something that someone else said. Looks like a bot to me.

3lijahG · **Joined:** Fri Mar 11, 2011 3:18 am **Posts:** 1079

jack520 wrote:

I like this post ,because I learn some knowledge from it.Thank you very much.

microsoft office professional 2010
microsoft outlook 2010

YEA.... you can really learn alot here...

Alessa Mason · **Posted:** Wed Aug 03, 2011 5:34 pm

3lijahG wrote:

jack520 wrote:

I like this post ,because I learn some knowledge from it.Thank you very much.

microsoft office professional 2010
microsoft outlook 2010

YEA.... you can really learn alot here...

well....he learn the worst video game......

3lijahG · **Joined:** Fri Mar 11, 2011 3:18 am **Posts:** 1079

Alessa Mason wrote:

3lijahG wrote:

jack520 wrote:

I like this post ,because I learn some knowledge from it.Thank you very much.

microsoft office professional 2010
microsoft outlook 2010

YEA.... you can really learn alot here...

well....he learn the worst video game......

bots are so screwed up...

Daftman · **Posted:** Sat Oct 01, 2011 7:56 pm

I'll be blunt.
Today, videogame devs are going down the shitter.
Bioware for instance, they used to make quality games, but now that they're with EA, their games have reduced in quality quite significantly. *cough* Dragon Age 2 and The Old Republic *cough*

And Capcom. They decided to give Devil May Cry to Ninja Theory, who's games that have been released so far have gotten mediocre reviews from both the actual reviewers and the gamers. Not only that, but they have been re-releasing games (Ultimate Marvel vs Capcom 3) and adding new characters, which could've been easily added in the first release. Sengoku Basara 3 Utage too. They already had the characters who are gonna be playable already in the code. With a hacking device, it would already be possible to play as them.

All in all, I am not very confident in the future of the videogame industry.

And really, Qwertyfail. That's just nit-picking. It's targeted at a younger audience. Why are you complaining? Focus on games that are released for your age group.

QwertyFail · **Posted:** Sat Oct 01, 2011 10:36 pm

Daftman wrote:

I'll be blunt.
Today, videogame devs are going down the shitter.
Bioware for instance, they used to make quality games, but now that they're with EA, their games have reduced in quality quite significantly. *cough* Dragon Age 2 and The Old Republic *cough*

And Capcom. They decided to give Devil May Cry to Ninja Theory, who's games that have been released so far have gotten mediocre reviews from both the actual reviewers and the gamers. Not only that, but they have been re-releasing games (Ultimate Marvel vs Capcom 3) and adding new characters, which could've been easily added in the first release. Sengoku Basara 3 Utage too. They already had the characters who are gonna be playable already in the code. With a hacking device, it would already be possible to play as them.

All in all, I am not very confident in the future of the videogame industry.

And really, Qwertyfail. That's just nit-picking. It's targeted at a younger audience. Why are you complaining? Focus on games that are released for your age group.

I actually enjoyed the previous games in the series as a teen...

-- Sat Oct 01, 2011 3:39 pm --

...And please read the ENTIRE thread before starting an argument that has already been resolved...

Daftman · **Posted:** Sun Oct 02, 2011 12:03 am

QwertyFail wrote:

Daftman wrote:

I'll be blunt.
Today, videogame devs are going down the shitter.
Bioware for instance, they used to make quality games, but now that they're with EA, their games have reduced in quality quite significantly. *cough* Dragon Age 2 and The Old Republic *cough*

And Capcom. They decided to give Devil May Cry to Ninja Theory, who's games that have been released so far have gotten mediocre reviews from both the actual reviewers and the gamers. Not only that, but they have been re-releasing games (Ultimate Marvel vs Capcom 3) and adding new characters, which could've been easily added in the first release. Sengoku Basara 3 Utage too. They already had the characters who are gonna be playable already in the code. With a hacking device, it would already be possible to play as them.

All in all, I am not very confident in the future of the videogame industry.

And really, Qwertyfail. That's just nit-picking. It's targeted at a younger audience. Why are you complaining? Focus on games that are released for your age group.

I actually enjoyed the previous games in the series as a teen...

-- Sat Oct 01, 2011 3:39 pm --

...And please read the ENTIRE thread before starting an argument that has already been resolved...

I did. I just wanted to post my opinion on the matter. I had no intention of continuing the argument. And yeah, the Spyro games were pretty fun, that is until their 2000 releases. Yeesh.

QwertyFail · **Posted:** Sun Oct 02, 2011 12:52 am

I should actually change the thread title to "Worst Video Game 'Marketing Decision and Method' of the 21st Century!!!"...

Whit3Mist · **Joined:** Mon May 28, 2012 10:32 pm **Posts:** 1

Yes,I have a 50% agreement with you.Yes,I hate spyro.Yes,I dislike the series,but to be honest I actually DISLIKE the part whe it's under 7-10,for my little brother's midget 10 year old classmate plays it.But actually,I don't think that's the worst game.

Vandheer Lorde II · **Posted:** Wed Sep 19, 2012 3:18 am

Nah mate, the WORST game of our century, is Goldeneye 007 Reloaded
Fuck that game was shiiiittttt!

Worst Video Game of the 21st Century!!! >:(

Who is online